inclusing tests
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ95 | |
2 | Ṁ40 | |
3 | Ṁ35 | |
4 | Ṁ27 | |
5 | Ṁ27 |
This needs some clarifications:
Does it have to be 1000 caused by a single nuclear weapon, or 1000 total across all nuclear weapons?
What deaths count? Immediate deaths only? Cancer deaths later? Deaths caused indirectly via infrastructure disruption, food supply disruption, etc?
Do dirty bombs count?
You can see my nuclear questions as an example of some possible answers, although it is not necessarily the ones you want to use here: https://manifold.markets/jack/will-a-nuclear-weapon-detonation-ca-1f2e9a9515f4
i traded under the impression that the deaths had to be directly due to a singular nuclear weapon detonation that occurs in 2023, and the deaths also occur in 2023 (due to the close date). the use of "a" in the title implies a singular weapon needs to be responsible, and not an aggregate of multiple.
And I went ahead and made the 2024 version:
Will a nuclear weapon cause over 1,000 deaths in 2024?NO
Arbitrage with:
Will North Korea kill 1,000+ people before 2024 with nuclear strikes?NO
Will Russia kill 1,000+ people before 2024 with nuclear strikes?NO
Will the United States kill 1,000+ people before 2024 with nuclear strikes?NO
(Not a strict arbitrage, since the linked markets could resolve positively with multiple strikes that each cause < 1000 deaths, but probably close enough for most purposes.)