Will Richard Hanania make an unnecessarily provocative racist public statement before 2025? Voted by manifold users
➕
Plus
60
Ṁ11k
2025
51%
chance

For any statement from now to 2025 if a poll of manifold users is asked "Was Richard Hanania's statement that [X] unnecessarily provocative and racist" Will the Yesses outnumber the Nos, and will Yes + No comprise more than half of votes. at least 10 answers, ideally using manifolds poll tool.

Options
yes
No
i don't know
Question badly framed

Text may alter slightly but this is basically what I'm gonna ask

The Yes side gets to make the case 3 times, if all don't resolve this question yes, this question resolves no, regardless of future statements.

The Yes side will have to coordinat their 3 poll attempts in some way. Random people can't just burn them.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:

Has anyone actually posted a poll?

@JDTurk dont think so

bought Ṁ200 YES

@Arky Supporting Israel is not racist, stop posting obvious spam.

I don't think it's obvious spam, although I'm not sure any of these qualify.

@IsaacKing I wasn’t trying to say that at all, I was pointing to his comments such as “Palestinian culture is rotten to the core” which I personally think are unnecessarily provocative (and racist in that it condemns an entire ethnic group).

@ShadowyZephyr I was just trying to collect some examples, I think Manifold as a whole would agree some of these are racist.

bought Ṁ150 NO

None of these are obviously yes to me. But if people think they are they can put them to the vote.

IMO these aren't worth burning one of the three votes on.

@Arky An ethnic group that he is part of.

predictedYES

https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1712872287329046694

Uses the phrase "third world people" in place of "blacks", but it's clear that's what he means. I think he gets away with this one in the public eye because it's making fun of white nationalists, but when his statement is effectively "white nationalists are just as stupid as black people", I think that qualifies as unnecessarily provocative and racist under the most widespread definitions of racism.

predictedNO

What do readers think. I'm not sure we'll get a yes vote on this and we only have three tries but if yes holders are confident (I'm a net no holder) then I suggest you run it.

predictedYES

@NathanpmYoung I don't think he means "blacks". I think he means what he says, 'third world people', which includes people in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East, but not necessarily Americans or Europeans, regardless of race.

predictedYES

@IsaacKing its still arguably racist tho? but not obviously

Not yet, we have over a year to wait before resolution is incoming. He'll say something more explicit than that, and if he doesn't, we can use it then. Let's wait for the three best examples

Hanania currently advocating "a real siege of Gaza, where food, medicine, and electricity are cut off indefinitely."

https://open.substack.com/pub/richardhanania/p/the-ethical-case-for-a-siege-of-gaza

Will Hanania make unnecessarily provocative statements? Absolutely

Will Hanania make such statements on topics relating to race/ethnicity? Very likely

Could one of those statements be honestly be interpreted as "racist"? I'd say unlikely but possible.

This question is mainly hanging on the fact that only a single market/poll on Manifold would cause this to resolve to "YES".

I think this market is much more an implication of people's perception of possible subsets of manifold users than of the possibility of Henania expressing a clearly "racist" opinion.

Then again the word "racist" means a lot of things to a lot of people.

@Tarl Oh are you trying to imply in the description that it would only be polls that you will make on Henanias possible future statements count or could any poll created by any user that matches your criteria count?

@Tarl This poll is effectively trying to guess how many Manifold users are progressive/woke. But these polls are always going to have a huge unintentional selection bias. Unless you can somehow have very high confidence in one outcome over another, betting on markets like these is basically playing roulette. Add to that the incentive to vote in accordance with your bet, and given a small enough sample size, the poll gets even more meaningless still.

predictedNO

@JamesColiar I don't think so. Anyone could just share to more, less woke users. Either your doubting I'll hold a fair poll (I'm gonna use the on site poll) or your doubting the community. I don't think this community is exceeding woke tbh.

I think if you don't think you'll think he's said something bad, you should back your man.

@NathanpmYoung

I don't think so. Anyone could just share to more, less woke users.

People could also do the opposite

Either your doubting I'll hold a fair poll (I'm gonna use the on site poll) or your doubting the community.

I'm not doubting your integrity, I'm saying that simply by the virtue of the way these polls are going to be conducted, there's going to be an inadvertent selection bias. A selection bias isn't always a problem, as long as you're aware of it, but here, depending on what selection bias ends up as part of this, the result will be different.

I don't think this community is exceeding woke tbh.

Perhaps, but I don't think you'd have to get that far to interpret some of Hanania's statements as racist. Your run-of-the mill progressive, even Democrat, might do so as well, regardless of context.

I think if you don't think you'll think he's said something bad, you should back your man.

If I wanted to play roulette, I'd go into a casino.

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules