Resolves YES if Greta Thunberg does any one of the following before January 1, 2035:

• Is listed as a signatory to a major AI safety or pause statement (e.g., Future of Life Institute's "Pause Giant AI Experiments" open letter, Center for AI Safety's "Statement on AI Risk")

• Is listed by an AI safety or pause organization (e.g., PauseAI, Future of Life Institute, Center for AI Safety) as a speaker, organizer, staff member, advisor, board member, or ambassador

• Publishes an explicit call for an AI pause/moratorium or endorses AI safety/pause goals, citing existential or societal risks and advocating for risk-first governance or a development pause

• Participates in a demonstration that primarily advocates for AI pause or AI safety goals

This market does NOT resolve YES if:

• Her advocacy focuses exclusively on AI ethics issues (bias, fairness, transparency) without addressing existential or catastrophic risks

• Her involvement concerns only near-term societal and economic impacts of AI (job displacement, inequality) without advocating for development pauses or safety-first approaches

• Advocacy focused solely on AI's environmental impact (energy consumption, carbon footprint) without addressing existential/catastrophic risks

• Criticism of AI companies for non-safety reasons (monopolistic practices, privacy violations, labor issues)

• Advocacy for AI consciousness, sentience, or model rights/welfare

• General criticism of technology or capitalism that happens to include AI

• Brief or incidental mentions of AI risks within broader speeches/writings on other topics

• Attendance at events where AI safety is discussed but not the primary focus

• Update 2025-09-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Signing alone may not be sufficient.

  • Even if Greta is listed as a signatory to a major AI safety/pause statement, it will NOT resolve Yes if she explicitly states her support is only for environmental reasons (e.g., carbon footprint/energy use) and not due to existential/catastrophic risks.

  • The market is about her joining the AI safety/existential risk movement specifically, not just supporting similar policies for other reasons.