
In the current South African lawsuit against Israel.
UN Report Accuses Israel of Systematically Using Sexual and Gender-Based Violence as a Weapon of War Against Palestinians. Some key take aways as summarized by Drop Site News:
Weaponized Sexual Violence and State-Sanctioned Brutality
Direct Orders and Climate of Impunity
Destruction of Reproductive Healthcare as a Tool of Genocide
Murder of Women and Girls
Intentional Strategy to Undermine Palestinian Survival
Sources:https://x.com/DropSiteNews/status/1900196535318515769
I think the market I created is similar to this: https://manifold.markets/nathanwei/will-icj-find-israel-in-breach-of-t?play=true
However it's possible that the court will find Israel guilty of some war crime but not breaching the genocide convention, for instance if they find Israel guilty of not following provisional order 7 here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africa's_genocide_case_against_Israel#Requested_provisional_measures_of_protection then Shump would perhaps resolve YES but I would resolve no.
Why not? War crimes and a genocide are miles apart. I think the gap should be bigger.
Personally, I think there's 95% that Israel committed war crimes and 3% that there is or will be a genocide.
@Shai I think the most likely outcome is that the court rules Israel is not committing genocide, but that it is committing war crimes, and in particular is in breach of the Genocide Convention because it is not doing enough to prevent incitement to genocide and letting Kahanist ministers (who to be sure are not running the Gaza policy) incite genocide.
You will have people then falsely accusing Israel of committing genocide.