EG "make me a 120 minute Star Trek / Star Wars crossover". It should be more or less comparable to a big-budget studio film, although it doesn't have to pass a full Turing Test as long as it's pretty good. The AI doesn't have to be available to the public, as long as it's confirmed to exist.
1,000
3.00Can't wrap my head around how people are still getting fooled by LLMs in mid-2025. From the start, it's been slop and nothing but slop all the way down.
Now the whole society has to pay LLM tax on all written communication. What a waste.
Quite interesting from China:
https://x.com/Baidu_Inc/status/1941151611755393210?t=eHHFjuUOl5Yc_Eer05kaFg&s=19
@ZaneMiller definitely showing the medium term promise of generative AI as a
major element within the content and even cinema creation pipelines.
Doesn’t make this market on track to resolve yes of course, as David Bolin rightly pointed out.
@ZaneMiller Each individual scene is super impressive, but there is not a single shot longer than 5 seconds in that entire 2:18 video. For all the hype and "exponential progress" talk, this has been the case since they announced Sora 1.5 years ago. Can't make a video longer than 10s without weird shit happening in it.
From the Midjourney discord:
As you know, our focus for the past few years has been images. What you might not know, is that we believe the inevitable destination of this technology are models capable of real-time open-world simulations.
What’s that? Basically; imagine an AI system that generates imagery in real-time. You can command it to move around in 3D space, the environments and characters also move, and you can interact with everything.
In order to do this, we need building blocks. We need visuals (our first image models). We need to make those images move (video models). We need to be able to move ourselves through space (3D models) and we need to be able to do this all fast (real-time models).
The next year involves building these pieces individually, releasing them, and then slowly, putting it all together into a single unified system. It might be expensive at first, but sooner than you’d think, it’s something everyone will be able to use.
So what about today? Today, we’re taking the next step forward. We’re releasing Version 1 of our Video Model to the entire community.
@robm https://x.com/emollick/status/1935504703023899096
at this point a midjourney 2028 video will be better than a Love, Death, Robotics Short on Netflix
better than a Love, Death, Robotics Short on Netflix
@Blomfilter A static black screen is better than LD&R on Netflix. Wasn't the last season done by LLMs btw? It definitely had the signature inane feel
@skibidist you're right, last season was ass, i paid 10$ for month subscription and only watched the 1 short about the spider girl in space...(based off teh short story) still though, space shorts , i'm a sucker for
https://www.reddit.com/r/midjourney/comments/1li6chu/midjourney_video_is_insane_for_ai_films/
its gonna get so good
@jim Never.
As in literally never. No one will do this; it does not matter whether it is possible or not, because no one is that stupid (except you, and it is unlikely you will make any games.)
@jim this is a hint of what's to come. Still in the "interactive art project" phase rather than the "video game" phase, but if you can't extrapolate at all... Odyssey is like Oasis (the minecraft one) but real-world instead of minecraft and with object permanence: https://experience.odyssey.world/
@jim That was neat, thanks for sharing. Hard disagree on it having object permanence, though. It might be a little better than the Minecraft one, But it totally made stuff up when I turned around or left and came back
@jim For some reason it reminded me of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbcLWGoP1I4 from another era.
Everyone kept saying it was a masterpiece, polish PM even gifted a copy to Obama. But I always saw it as animation slop, still believe it's just animation slop.