Will "chatbotting" replace "ghosting" by end of 2029?
Will "chatbotting" replace "ghosting" by end of 2029?
➕
Plus
187
Ṁ24k
2029
23%
chance

Hot take. Today some people will "ghost" someone by not replying to their messages. But, in the grim dark future, they will instead "chatbot" them by hooking their incoming messages up to a language model. Eg, the LLM may simulate a person gently breaking up with them over time, or who is too busy for another date right now.

Resolves yes if in early 2030 I think this hot take was hot. Resolves no if not. If I am dead the market resolver may substitute their own opinion.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00


Sort by:
bought Ṁ10 YES7mo

Yes because I hope so because it would be funny.

9mo

What about if they weren't used for breakups but used to keep in touch with a greater number of people, @MartinRandall?

i.e. some service that responds to messages when the LLM has high confidence (above some custom % threshold) that the simulated response is close to how the real person would respond. Then for messages that don't meet that bar, the user has to manually approve from a selection of possible LLM responses or choose to write the response themselves.

  • in practice this would probably mean automating small talk & other low entropy moments in conversations

(assuming that LLMs no longer have hallucinations & become fairly good approximations of a given person)

Not sure if there's a market and/or term for such a thing already.

9mo

@elf It would count if botting is being done in places where someone would choose to ghost given 2020 tech.

I'm not restricting this to romantic relationships.

It does have to be automated. A conversational assistant who only suggests responses is not in the spirit of my 2023 hot take.

predictedYES 1y

Growing more bullish on this by the day

1y

@firstuserhere if there's at least one AI regulation I support, it's requiring "generated by AI" labelling

1y

Ghosting is easy; just don't reply to their messages. Unless you can press a button on your messaging app and have it start "chatbotting", I don't see it replacing ghosting; too much work.

1y

@rockenots By 2029 I assume someone will have productized this.

1y

Ghosting is cowardice. It is a way to avoid a disconforting confrontation. What would be yet more corward : chatbotting. You still avoid confrontation and you don't feel guilty as the people you leave will not be worried then upset.

1y

@Zardoru in the grim dark future of humanity there is only cowardice.

predictedYES 1y

@MartinRandall who says?

1y

@ZZZZZZ Zardoru's 15 mana

1y

too early to tell, but definitely an interesting idea

1y

@VoyagerRock I'd be willing to place a bet within a year

1y

This seems a lot meaner than ghosting

1y

@HannahFox definitely

1y

@HannahFox This is a valid concern. "Chatbotting" could definitely be used in a malicious way, such as to harass or intimidate someone. However, I believe that "chatbotting" can also be a force for good. If used responsibly, it could be a great tool for communication and understanding. Just like any other technology, its impact will ultimately depend on how it's used.

predictedYES 1y

@MartinRandall sure, but this specific application - I'm not a big fan

predictedNO 1y

@MartinRandall It feels wrong to trick someone into thinking they're talking to you when they're actually just talking to a chat bot. They will probably figure it out eventually and then it is even worse than just ghosting them. In my opinion if you dislike someone that much you should just block them instead of doing this. That's why I think it is worse to "chatbot" someone than to ghost them.

1y

I agree. How could it be 'a tool for communication and understanding' if you are not communicating at all, but using a chat bot? A chat bot cannot 'explain why I'm not interested in talking with you and provide constructive feedback'.

1y

@HannahFox I see your point--it could be considered deceptive to use an LLM in this way. Also, if two people are both responding to each other using LLMs, it could create confusion and lead to miscommunication. This is because the two LLMs may not understand each other--they may interpret the other person's messages differently, or may not know how to respond appropriately. This could lead to a cycle of frustration and misunderstanding, which is obviously not ideal. Ultimately, I believe that communication is best achieved through authentic, human-to-human interactions. While AI technology can certainly be helpful in some ways, I believe that it is ultimately no replacement for genuine connection.

predictedNO 1y

@MartinRandall I see you - You're doing it right now! 😛

predictedNO 1y

@AngolaMaldives yeah, there's a certain je ne sais quo about his comment which strongly smells of GPT-3. Sorry @MartinRandall if you did in fact write that comment yourself!

What is this?

What is Manifold?
Manifold is the world's largest social prediction market.
Get accurate real-time odds on politics, tech, sports, and more.
Win cash prizes for your predictions on our sweepstakes markets! Always free to play. No purchase necessary.
Are our predictions accurate?
Yes! Manifold is very well calibrated, with forecasts on average within 4 percentage points of the true probability. Our probabilities are created by users buying and selling shares of a market.
In the 2022 US midterm elections, we outperformed all other prediction market platforms and were in line with FiveThirtyEight’s performance. Many people who don't like trading still use Manifold to get reliable news.
How do I win cash prizes?
Manifold offers two market types: play money and sweepstakes.
All questions include a play money market which uses mana Ṁ and can't be cashed out.
Selected markets will have a sweepstakes toggle. These require sweepcash S to participate and winners can withdraw sweepcash as a cash prize. You can filter for sweepstakes markets on the browse page.
Redeem your sweepcash won from markets at
S1.00
→ $1.00
, minus a 5% fee.
Learn more.
© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules