Will @Aella post a pole on Twitter by the end of January?
Will @Aella post a pole on Twitter by the end of January?
Basic
35
Ṁ36k
resolved Jan 30
Resolved
YES

Please note that I spelled the title correctly.

Includes either Twitter account.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00

🏅 Top traders


Sort by:
2y

https://twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/1612253613333561344/photo/1

This photo appears to contain two poles, one clearly visible in the foreground. Citations:

Merriam Webster:

Pole: a long slender usually cylindrical object (such as a length of wood).

ChatGPT:

I believe this is conclusive.

Any counterarguments before I resolve this to YES?

2y

@IsaacKing Those are indeed identifiable poles.

@IsaacKing she posted two poles, not a pole.

Maybe we need a poll of poles to resolve this.

predictedYES 2y

@MartinRandall A pole is contained in the image; whether there are any other poles is irrelevant. I would be interested to see the result of a poll of poles, but it won't affect the outcome of this market.

predictedYES 2y

@IsaacKing Are you still intending on closing this out early? It has been a week without any real counterarguments.

2y

@IsaacKing damnit

2y

@IsaacKing Why was this in US Politics? Please don't forget to fix AI's mistakes when you create markets.

2y

Do people from Poland count? How about celestial poles, poles of astronomical bodies, or magnetic poles?

2y

@StevenK Those all sound like poles to me.

2y

@IsaacKing did you know that water molecules have magnetic poles? And the human body is mostly water. So any naked photo of Aella should suffice.

2y

@MartinRandall The pole must be a noticible part of the image.

2y

@MartinRandall It's almost too easy to find technicalities to resolve YES on.

2y

@StevenK Too esoteric. I doubt anyone looking at such a picture would go "yup, this contains a pole".

2y

@IsaacKing @EliezerYudkowsky is fond of saying things about how a sufficiently smart AI should be able to look at a still image from a camera and derive the laws of physics. So really this is mostly a function of when you consider the observer to be, and whether you expect a future AI overlord to someday go trawling through @Aella nudes, which objectively seems to be of higher likelihood than other baseline nudes on the internet given social circle overlap and all.

2y

@EdwardKmett Observer must have normal human values, and this is happening around the end of January, so I hope you can get your AI aligned by then.

2y

@IsaacKing This is the worst story hook ever.

predictedYES 2y

@IsaacKing

There are a few ways in which one could argue Aella posted a pole in this tweet:

1: The photo on the right is Jeff Goldblum as Ian Malcolm. Wikipedia says of Goldblum:

His family is from Russia and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, with roots in Starobin and Zolochiv.

These places are in Belarus and Ukraine, respectively, but I believe they were both historically part of Poland.

2: Fox Mulder is played by David Duchovny, who is also an American descendant of Polish Jews.

3: The character Abed Nadir, according to Wikipedia, "is born to a Palestinian father from Gaza and a Polish American mother", and is fluent in Polish.

I'm not sure whether you'd count any of these people as "poles" for market resolution purposes. I'm also not sure whether you'd count them as having been "posted", though I would argue that at least Goldblum was posted.

2y

@StevenK Points for effort, but those are not clear poles.

2y

@IsaacKing I don't suppose that in this pixel art, the table leg counts as a pole, or that the Moon's north pole or south pole is noticeable enough?

2y

@StevenK Nope. Someone would need to be able to look at the image without the context of this market and have a reasonable chance of thinking to themselves "that's a pole".

2y

@IsaacKing How about this?

2y

@StevenK apparently the stick that holds up an umbrella is called a shaft, not a pole.

predictedYES 2y

@MartinRandall Hmm, is it?

2y

@StevenK Proof!

2y

@StevenK Was that posted on Twitter?

predictedYES 2y

What is this?

What is Manifold?
Manifold is the world's largest social prediction market.
Get accurate real-time odds on politics, tech, sports, and more.
Win cash prizes for your predictions on our sweepstakes markets! Always free to play. No purchase necessary.
Are our predictions accurate?
Yes! Manifold is very well calibrated, with forecasts on average within 4 percentage points of the true probability. Our probabilities are created by users buying and selling shares of a market.
In the 2022 US midterm elections, we outperformed all other prediction market platforms and were in line with FiveThirtyEight’s performance. Many people who don't like trading still use Manifold to get reliable news.
How do I win cash prizes?
Manifold offers two market types: play money and sweepstakes.
All questions include a play money market which uses mana Ṁ and can't be cashed out.
Selected markets will have a sweepstakes toggle. These require sweepcash S to participate and winners can withdraw sweepcash as a cash prize. You can filter for sweepstakes markets on the browse page.
Redeem your sweepcash won from markets at
S1.00
→ $1.00
, minus a 5% fee.
Learn more.
© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules